|
||||||||||||
|
RELIGIOUS PRACTICES OF KASHMIRI HINDUS Deyjehuor its Meaning and its implied view of Kashmiri Marriage AUM
ParamaSivAaya NammaHa! AUM BhairVAaya NammaHa!
Introduction I would like to point out that the roots of this symbol, Deyjehuor, are in the Spiritual experience of a Yogi, in YAamla (union) of Siva and its Shaktee, which are non-distinct from each other. To understand this clearly, I will follow the following seven steps. In the first step, 1.
The shape of Deyjehuor will be explained for those
who may not have noticed it or may not have seen
it. After that The shape of a
Deyjehuor
To understand the root significance of Deyjehuor we will have to take a slight detour to understand certain Concepts in which Advaitic-Siva is understood. The Categories I will use are primarily from the PratybhijnnAa. The Advaitic-Siva in PratybhijnnAa is described the reality which is one without the second. This one reality is called PraKAasa-Vimarsini. This compound name is really a compound characterization of one reality. It is further added that this PraKAasa and Vimarsini are not separate or distinct from each other. In fact these aspects can not be separated from one another. The analogy given is that of Fire and Heat, (Please keep in mind that these are only analogies are only direction pointers) which can not be separated from each other. What is being said is that reality is PraKAasa, and unlike ordinary PraKAasa, this PrakAasa is self- aware. Self-awareness here has been used for the technical term of Vimarsini. The closest English term corresponding to PraKAasa is Light and the closest term to Vimarsini is the Awareness of consciousness. Thus from this point ultimate existent is Light, not an ordinary Light, but Light which is self-Aware. In this context PraKAasa should be understood as that which lights-up (as in a meaning, or as in ordinary light some thing is brought forth,.. “Ah! That is It.”). That is as a source of cognition. (The simplest example would be ordinary Consciousness, which gets manifested by the Awareness. As awareness of the limited self, or glass, etc.) Notice that even ordinary Awareness can be shifted from one limited object to the other, bringing forth that particular object in to ‘manifestation’, or it can fold back and focus on to the self. Even in ordinary routine life the awareness becomes the outer manifestation of the inner individual Consciousness. The PraKAasa is thus an unchanging transcendent aspect of that one reality and Vimarsini the changing, immanent aspect of the same one reality. However these transcendent and immanent aspects are not and can not be separated from each other. (Notice this contradictory transcendence and the immanence is held together with out a difference and is the reason why Advaitic-Siva is simultaneously both realistic and idealistic.) In Sanskrit language the PraKAasa has masculine gender hence is “HE” aspect, also called Siva. Where as Vimarsini in Sanskrit language has feminine gender hence called the “SHE” aspect. Vimarsini (Awareness) because of being able to be Sankuchit (limited) and as well as Visa (universal), is hence called Immanent. It is this aspect which manifests both the limited aspects and the universal aspects. And because of that Vimarsini is called Shakti, for it alone manifests both the limited and the universal aspects. PraKAasa being unchanging transcendence. (Keep in mind that it is not different from PraKAasa. The highest state of this reality is called ParmaSiva.) The message from here I want to take forward is that of (Vimarsini) the characterization of Shakti. |
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||